The legislative session is set to end on May 17. Our goal is to resolve our complicated budget issues by then.How did it get so complicated, I wonder? According to the April Economic Update from MMB, revenues for FY 2010 (ending June 30) came in $40 million below what was expected. In a $10,000 million budget (for the period from 7/1/09 to 3/31/10) that is not so much money. Most of the increase came from increases in costs associated with the recession. While these need to be fixed, the need for entitlement reform has been known to the Legislature and Rep. Haws for quite some time.
Let's read on:
With the passage of the new federal health care bill we are currently awaiting information from the feds on what states can expect from new MA reimbursement funds. The numbers are quite large and, depending on the amount, will determine whether we horribly slash state health care services to the most vulnerable citizens or make smaller cuts impacting less people. Given that lots of disabled, dependent-care Minnesotans will be affected by our budget decisions, I believe it is wise for us to wait for further information from the federal government before we proceed to finalize our budget. Otherwise our only choice would be to deeply slash services to these vulnerable citizens.For those of you unfamiliar with the ways of St. Paul, this is an activity known as "kicking the can down the road." Because they don't want to cut anyone (health and human services is scheduled to spend more than $4,200 million in fiscal year 2010) they are hoping that the U.S. government sends them some money to foot the bill. The 2009 federal stimulus bill only pays through December 2010. A bill in Congress to extend the funding an additional six months is in trouble because Congress does not know how to pay for it.
And under current proposal made today in the Legislature, expansion of health care coverage could end up costing the state millions of dollars more. It doesn't have those dollars...yet. You do. We have a fix in place for these individuals in the GAMC bill that passed. DFLers want to raid other money to pay for switching them to Medicaid early. It's expensive, and I oppose it.
Please, Representative Haws: Balance the budget and come home. It's time to debate.
Laws Will Put Minnesotans Back to WorkHere's a graph of monthly, seasonally-adjusted data for construction since 2008.
We are on the homeward stretch with only a month remaining before we adjourn the 2010 Legislative Session. This session has been fast-paced and focused on pursuing job-creating legislation to jumpstart the state’s economic recovery and balance the budget.
Our job creation strategy paid off with the early passage of the Omnibus Capital Investment Bill and the Minnesota Jobs Stimulus Bill. These timely pieces of legislation have been signed into law – just in time to make the most of the upcoming construction season.
These laws will help promote job growth and economic development across the state by ensuring small businesses are more competitive and by creating employment opportunities in bioscience, manufacturing, high-tech industries, construction and infrastructure development.
|Data in thousands. See any help from bonding there?|
Truth is, the DFL thinks a dollar taken from you and given to a construction worker creates a job. What if your dollar was meant to hire someone else? Or to buy something from a store owner who would have hired a helper with that dollar?
The value of bonding is not in job creation but in asset creation. We bond to create public assets that generate more value than what we spend on them. When the building is done, what will Minnesota have gotten for its money?
Looking for Minnesotan’s Ideas on ReformA legislator who has been there more than two terms wants other ideas? Where are his?
Our unprecedented structural budget deficit is proving to be a catalyst for redesign and reform initiatives at the State Legislature. My colleagues and I are moving forward on many fronts with reforms that will benefit Minnesota taxpayers and help rebuild our state’s prosperity.
I assure you that as we go about restoring fiscal stability in our state budget, our state government can no longer afford to keep going about business as usual. Pursuing the status quo will only become increasingly unaffordable as we continue to absorb the impacts of the Great Recession, aging demographics, and high property tax burdens.
So, it is in our best interest to redesign and reform state government operations in a way that will deliver greater efficiency in government services at a lower cost.
Almost at the onset of the 2010 Legislative Session, a Redesign Caucus was formed and proceeded to launch a “Redesign Comment Line” asking citizens to share their ideas on how areas of state or local government can be reformed to increase results at a lower cost.
Minnesotans are encouraged to submit their ideas at www.house.mn/redesign or call the Redesign Hotline at 651-297-8391 or 1-800-551-5520. The best ideas will be put into a “Citizen Redesign Bill” in the 2011 Legislative Session.
I have a model for zero-based budgeting, a bill that has just passed the Georgia Legislature. It phases in zero-based budgeting over a set of years and a requirement of each department to offer alternative funding levels and outcomes of those levels. Georgia has an annual budget while Minnesota's is biennial, so we would modify this to do half of state government in the 2012-13 biennium and the other half in 2014-15, then repeat the process each four years. Every governor therefore would have an opportunity to review his or her departments and build them from scratch. This will be the first bill I will author when I go to St. Paul next January.